Who’s to blame?

A recent case of ‘cartoon-inspired violence’ occurred in Rotherham, where young teens chose to re-enact ‘Kick a Ginger Day’, from the cartoon South Park, by kicking ginger-haired students. This has revived the ‘blame-game’ for violence in young people yet again. The program was given a TV-MA rating, which warns that the content is not suitable for children. Parents could be to blame for allowing their children access to the program or for not discussing what is, and is not, socially-acceptable behaviour. Media could be held accountable for portraying society as a violent place on their networks.  Children could also be to blame because, ultimately, they were the ones making the choice to hurt other children. Instead, the creators of South Park are being blamed.

The view that violence in cartoons causes the children who watch them to turn violent, or at least, to accept violence as a social norm, has been tossed around, studied and debated in detail for a long time. Some experts state that violence is shunned by children when watching programs, while others insist that violence should be removed from children’s viewing. It seems that parents cannot get a definitive answer on the question of violence in cartoons, but, while most children do not try to re-enact the action quite as literally by chopping up cats and expecting them to chase mice afterwards, medical records are available to prove that some do identify more literally with characters and actions than others.

I don’t have the answer to the ‘blame-game’, any more than the experts do, but in this case, South Park creators sent the program out with an ending which showed the character learning the error of his ways, and a warning that it was not suitable for children. They didn’t force anyone to watch it, and they didn’t force children to kick other children. A dilemma of story-telling is that to show the difference between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ behaviour, both have to be present. In fact, I can’t think of a single story where the hero battles against thin air to show how ‘good’ triumphs over ‘evil’.  So, while the creators were totally responsible for the program content, I don’t believe that they were entirely to blame for cartoon-inspired violence.  To me, that would be the same as making a tool manufacturer responsible when we hit our own thumbs with their hammers.

About Fionabc

I’m Fionabc, an ordinary person living in a country town in Australia and travelling the world via my computer. I enjoy meeting people on my travels, sharing news and generally enjoying being a member of the ‘global village’ the Internet allows us to be. In my offline life, I spend time with my family and enjoy cross-stitch and crochet, especially when the cats leave the threads alone. When they don’t, I grit my teeth and tell myself “it’s a type of puzzle,” and “I enjoy untangling puzzles.” One day, I might even solve it!
This entry was posted in General Posts and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Who’s to blame?

  1. jackie-lynn says:

    Long story..short. The cartoons..comic books..television programs..video games and the local and national news are all making impressions on our children. The ones to blame are the ones who parent these children. Parents are not monitoring their children. Televisions have locks on them. Monitor their reading materials..video games..movies. Parent your children. Spend more family time. It is a cold cruel world out there but good parenting can prepare the children without watching programs with explicit sexual scenes..cursing..extreme violence. Parents need to step up and take back control of your children. Children killing other children did not occur prior to the 50’s..70’s.. When censorship was no longer used..the children were exposed to the garbage. Southpark is trash coming from a small child’s mouth. Parents..Monitor the children. Who is to blame? Lack of parenting.

    • Fionabc says:

      I agree that parents should be monitoring kids Jackie-Lynn, but I can’t lay all the blame at their feet.

      Programs which are banned at home can be seen elsewhere. Risqué posters on shop windows and billboards advertise the latest products; singers perform as if they would never be seen by young minds and ordinary people walk around in fashionable clothing they are barely wearing, while using language no parent wants to hear from their child’s mouth. Parents can try to teach good behaviour, but when society continually shows the alternative behaviour to be normal, it can be difficult to reverse its affect on the child.

      If you, or anyone else, has a solution on how to change this trend….I’m all ears.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s